Buckman & Buckman - A law firm dedicated to helping YOU!

In the News

Family Receives $285K in School Beating Case

By Natalie Neysa Alund | Bradenton Herald
June 23, 2009

BRADENTON — The Manatee County School Board may soon appeal a jury verdict awarding $285,000 in damages to the family of a student severely beaten in a classroom in front of his teacher.

Jurors found the school board was negligent for the facial injuries Jesse Shipman, then 12, sustained at Harlee Middle School on April 28, 2004.

Shipman was attacked by a 13-year-old classmate named Joshua Grooms, said Amiee Buckman, who represented the Shipman family with her husband, Drake Buckman.

“He punched him repeatedly until he was unconscious on the ground, and then began to punch and kick him more,” she said.

Shipman sustained more then 10 facial fractures in the attack.

“He basically had to have his facial bones put back together,” Buckman said. “They had to wait 2 1/2 months to have the swelling go down before they could attempt to begin the reconstruction. He still has some sinus problems.”

Grooms, she said, had an extensive disciplinary record and was later convicted of felony battery in the beating.

Buckman said the classroom teacher did nothing to stop the attack.

Shipman’s mother, Lucinda Affedlt, filed suit against the school board in December 2007.

The jury handed down the verdict Friday at the Manatee County Judicial Center. It awarded Shipman’s family $35,000 in damages for medical costs because the boy had to have reconstructive facial surgery.

They also received $250,000 for past and future pain and suffering.

School Board Attorney John Bowen on Monday said he plans to recommend to the school board that it appeal the verdict.

No one can foresee when a student is going to attack another student, Bowen said.

“It was not preventable,” he said.

 

« back to top


Dorothy's Story

By Anthony Colarossi | Orlando Sentinel Staff Writer
August 3, 2003

Sitting on her bed, Dorothy looks like any other 18-year old who has just left high school and is preparing for adulthood.

Two pictures of her jubilant graduating class hang above her bed. Mardi Gras beads dangle from the bedpost. And she has hung a few frames of rap star Nelly around the room as well.

But any notion of a typical adolescence disappears when Dorothy starts talking about her hobbies and her past.

She enjoys Magic Markers and coloring books, and she often clutches a teddy bear for comfort. She has one more love, too.

Thumbing through her photo albums, she stares at dozens of pictures of a 2-year old girl with Dorothy's blue eyes, high cheeks and sandy brown hair.

This is her daughter, conceived after James M. Carver, a caregiver in a state licensed group home, repeatedly raped Dorothy.

Prosecutors considered Carver's behavior especially vile because he was supposed to be watching over Dorothy, who is mentally retarded.

Carver told Dorothy he loved her, authorities said. But when she became pregnant, he told her to lie about the identity of the father.

In 1999 the state placed Dorothy at Sandy Terrace, a Southwest Florida group home run by people with a history of serious licensing violations. This is where Carver coaxed Dorothy into repeated sex acts while she was only 15.

Dorothy gave birth. Carver went to prison. The state took custody of the child. And now, Florida's Department of Children & Families is being sued for negligence.

Dorothy now lives in a supervised residential setting near Tampa.

Sarasota based attorneys Drake Buckman and Richard A. Filson, who filed the suit, said Dorothy's case is an example of the state's inability to assure the safety of its most vulnerable residents: the developmentally disabled.

Other advocates throughout the state agree, viewing Dorothy's case and others like it as evidence that Florida is repeatedly failing to protect developmentally disabled residents in group homes.

Monumental' Crisis:
No one can say how many mentally retarded women are raped while in the state's care, and it's likely no one will ever find out. The victims often cannot speak for themselves and, when they can, their caregivers frequently don't believe them, experts say.

But anecdotal evidence which sometimes surfaces only when the victims become pregnant is growing.

Dorothy is among at least a handful of cases in the past few years that have come to light after the victims became pregnant.

Advocates nationwide say these pregnancies are symptoms of a much larger tragedy. In fact, they say, violence against developmentally disabled people is an epidemic largely ignored because few crimes against them are reported.

"Both research and the experience of rape crisis service providers tell us that the problem is monumental," said Debbie Rogers, director of public awareness at the Florida Council Against Sexual Violence.

Women with developmental disabilities, she said, are particularly vulnerable.

"A vast majority of disabled people have been victimized in one way or another," she said. "Communication and mobility issues make disabled people particularly vulnerable to sexual predators."

To varying degrees, those conditions have contributed to a growing awareness of assaults against retarded victims in Florida.

In the past three years, there have been at least five sexual assaults in group homes that resulted in pregnancies. Two rapes occurred in the Orlando area; one in the Miami area; and Filson represents Dorothy and another retarded client in South Florida raped in a foster home.

A year ago, a severely disabled woman gave birth to a son after being raped at Laurel Hill Cluster in Pine Hills. Phillip Mebane, an ex-employee, was charged with sexual battery of a helpless person.

In late May, a Miami-Dade judge ordered an abortion for a 28-year old rape victim, known in court documents as Z.H., out of concern the pregnancy could threaten her life. Z.H. was raped while living in a South Florida group home.

Then J.D.S., a 22-year old woman who was raped and became pregnant while living in a southwest Orlando group home, brought nationwide attention to the care of the developmentally disabled in May.

Far more retarded than Dorothy, J.D.S. had no legal guardian to help her make decisions about her pregnancy. Her case prompted a reform effort to ensure that anyone who needs a guardian gets one.

A sixth victim, who was raped and became pregnant while living in a St. Lucie County group home in 1991, was awarded $7.6 million by a jury and the Legislature authorized the payment last year. When the state ceased its aggressive defense against the woman, Gov. Jeb Bush said, "We made a mistake, and this child deserves better."

Because of the nature of the crimes, the Orlando Sentinel is not identifying the women.

As more of these victims become known, advocates think it's long past time for the state to be more aggressive in protecting them.

"We all need to review our relationships [with developmentally disabled people] and think, 'Gosh, how can this keep happening' " said Deborah Linton, assistant director with the Association for Retarded Citizens of Florida. "When you have vulnerable people, you will always have someone out there willing to take advantage of them. But the tragedy of these cases didn't teach us anything, if we don't improve things. We should and could do more to stop it."

Plans to ensure legal guardians for anyone who needs them might help, Linton said. Employing same sex caregivers is another idea.

"As far as monitoring homes, more can be done," Linton said.

DCF blamed

In Florida, the main line of defense is the Department of Children & Families, the agency that licenses group homes and makes sure they are safe.

"This is an agency that should be above reproach," Buckman said. "But this is an agency that can't prevent retarded kids from being raped in its own custody."

In Dorothy's lawsuit, Filson accuses DCF officials of placing her in the group home even though they had found a long history of serious problems by its owners that eventually led to the home's closing.

"They moved her from the frying pan and into the fire," he said. "But if she hadn't gotten pregnant, we would have never found out [about the abuse]."

DCF Secretary Jerry Regier, in an e?mail statement, said he takes Dorothy's case and others like it "very seriously."

"Florida's developmental disabilities professionals work constantly to ensure that our clients are able to be self-sufficient to the maximum extent possible and in the safest environments," Regier said, noting that both Dorothy and her child are now safe.

Yet critics point to another side of DCF that they say shows an agency in denial or worse, an agency with two faces.

In its legal defense of Filson's lawsuit, DCF alleges that Dorothy herself was "guilty of negligence, which caused or contributed" to her situation because she did not resist Carver's advances.

"Any allegations relating to sexual intercourse and/or rape was in fact consensual," DCF attorney Lynne Dailey wrote in late June in the state's response to Dorothy's lawsuit.

Advocates for the disabled find the agency's position troubling. They want to know how DCF can blame a retarded rape victim when her attacker already has admitted guilt and is in prison.

"If you're in a caregiver role, [having sex with a retarded client] is just not consensual," said Linton, with the Association for Retarded Citizens. "I'm sorry to hear that."

Other advocates are just as troubled, but not surprised, at DCF's defense in Dorothy's lawsuit.

"It's obvious they haven't learned a thing, and it's a continuing problem," said Lance Block, past president of the Association for Retarded Persons of Palm Beach County.

"These are special needs people. They need extraordinary care, and they're not getting it from this department," said Block, who has a daughter with Down syndrome and is a longtime advocate for the developmentally disabled.

"I think the cases that you're able to find and report on is just the tip of the iceberg," he said.

"What is the rate of sexual abuse in our group homes that the state is paying for?"

Block, an attorney who represented Z.H. in the Miami case and the woman who won the $7.6 million jury award, said the Legislature should explore this question and demand the data from DCF. He notes that the state's Bill of Rights of Persons Who Are Developmentally Disabled specifically states that this group of people has "the right to be free from sexual abuse in residential facilities."

"The Legislature ought to make sure that it's being enforced," Block said.

DCF spokesman Bob Brooks said the agency is trying to adhere to the spirit of the bill.

"If one of our clients suffers a sexual assault, that's one too many. We haven't done enough," Brooks said. "It's certainly our goal and our desire that none of that happens."

'Happy tears'

Dorothy's life of abuse did not start at the Sandy Terrace group home.

DCF placed her there after discovering that her mother had been hiring her out as a prostitute when she was a child.

And now, the tragedy has come full circle because her baby is a ward of the state.

Dorothy discovered she was pregnant in early 2001.

"I was wondering why I was getting sick all the time," she recalled.

When Carver first learned Dorothy was pregnant, he told her to tell authorities she had sex with a man while attending a YMCA camp.

Later, however, he showered her with gifts and promised to care for her, she said in an interview with the Sentinel.

"He said he would be there for me, or something like that," said Dorothy, showing no anger.

At the time, Dorothy also told police that Carver had said he was planning to break up with his girlfriend, live with her and raise the child.

She doesn't remember all of her encounters with Carver. In an interview with the Sentinel, she said she understood that he did something wrong.

In January, Carver pleaded guilty to lewd sexual battery of a minor and lewd conduct involving a minor. Prosecutor John L. Burns said the plea deal was reached to spare Dorothy from going through trial and reliving her experiences.

Burns said the case was troubling because Dorothy appeared convinced that Carver loved her.

"I think she genuinely felt they had a relationship. She was in love with him," Burns said. "This case was especially sad because of the way the victim viewed it."

In spring 2001, Dorothy gave birth to her baby. She remembers pain, an hour long labor and then absolute joy.

"When I put her on my chest," Dorothy said, "tears, happy tears."

She lived with her child in a supervised setting for eight months. But then DCF took away the baby, concluding Dorothy wasn't capable of caring for her.

Apparently she left the child, unattended, in a bathtub. It's not clear for how long because DCF is not commenting on specifics.

Dorothy, whose IQ is below 60, remembers having problems handling her daughter when she was an infant.

She desperately wants her daughter back and admits making mistakes. But she says she has matured since the incident, which occurred when she was 16. And she hopes the state will give her another chance.

"I was getting frustrated with her. I didn't know what she wanted," Dorothy said. "Now if I can't [handle her], I'll ask for help. Now that she's older, I can stick her in a room until she calms down."

While separated from her daughter, Dorothy completed high school and finished parenting classes. She wants a job working with animals, perhaps with a veterinarian. She's ambitious.

"I don't want to end up working in some restaurant," she laughed.

A history of trouble

While Dorothy finds herself in a safe, supervised setting for now, there's no guarantee that will last forever especially, her lawyers say, if she finds herself in a state?licensed group home.

Her case illustrates how the state can place an extremely vulnerable person, who already had been victimized by her mother, into another abusive environment.

SMORGAN Inc., the company running the group home where Dorothy was raped, had a long list of serious licensing violations in the years leading up to Dorothy's placement at Sandy Terrace. That group home, in Port Charlotte, was shut down in 2001. But its closing came only after one of the other Southwest Florida facilities operated by SMORGAN burned down, killing two residents there.

The SMORGAN group homes, which were owned and operated by Vicky Swan, became infamous for the abuse and neglect that occurred at the facilities. They had other cases of sexual abuse involving another client and another Swan employee. The homes had more than 120 violations of state regulations.

Residents were fed rotten food. They were physically and verbally abused. Sometimes they were locked in their rooms.

Filson found a Dec. 7, 2000, letter from DCF denying the relicensing for Sandy Terrace. This was shortly before Dorothy discovered she was pregnant.

"During the last three years, [DCF] has continually identified licensing issues at Swan's group homes," the letter states. "Due to an ongoing lack of remedy by the provider, we have no other choice but to take further action for the consumers of the department."

In an August 2002 letter to then?DCF Secretary Kathleen Kearney, Filson wrote that DCF knew of problems at SMORGAN group homes but "did not remove [Dorothy] from a placement that posed a danger to her."

Swan, also known as Elizabeth Morgan, is named as a defendant in Dorothy's lawsuit. Also named are Carver; Sonya Bell, another caregiver at Sandy Terrace; and the Children's Home Society of Florida, which was responsible for monitoring and inspecting the group home.

Attorneys for Bell and Vicky Swan did not return calls. Douglas Lumpkin, attorney for the Children's Home Society, refused to speak about the specifics of the case.

"I don't think these things should be tried in the newspaper," Lumpkin said. "In general, we believe the Children's Home Society acted appropriately and fulfilled their responsibility under the circumstances."

To Dorothy's attorneys and other advocates for the disabled, however, DCF cannot escape the fact that Dorothy was raped in a group home licensed by the agency by a person who was supposed to be taking care of her.

Dorothy says she hasn't heard from Carver since he went to prison, where he is serving an 11½ year sentence.

And despite his imprisonment, the state hasn't severed his parental rights yet. That leaves open the possibility that members of Carver's family can be considered for the child's placement another insult against Dorothy, Buckman said.

"What more does she need to go through that she hasn't gone through?"

Stephanie Erickson of the Sentinel staff contributed to this report. Anthony Colarossi can be reached at 407-420-6218 or acolarossi@orlandosentinel.com.

 

Copyright © 2003, Orlando Sentinel

 

 

« back to top


Officers are Sued Over Gun Arrest

North Port man wants statute on concealed weapons to be clarified
By HEATHER ALLEN | heather.allen@heraldtribune.com

NORTH PORT -- He was pulled over for a speeding infraction -- traveling 21 mph over the speed limit -- but a lead foot is not what got Jeffrey Poulakis in trouble.

It was the gun in his car's glove compartment.

He was arrested and charged with carrying a concealed firearm, but the charge did not go far.

Prosecutors declined to prosecute the case, citing case law that says a gun owner does not need a concealed weapons permit in order to carry a firearm in a vehicle.

And now, Poulakis is suing two North Port police officers, claiming that they violated his constitutional rights by arresting him on the weapons charge.

The federal lawsuit, which was filed in July, will ask the courts to decipher and clarify the ambiguous state statute that governs carrying concealed weapons in the state of Florida.

The head of the state's licensing division said the statute is not clear and only gives "hints" on how to interpret it.

"It's going to be an individual police officer's call," said W.H. "Buddy" Bevis, director of the state Division of Licensing.

On Nov. 21, 2006, officer Michael Rogers pulled Poulakis over for speeding. As Rogers approached the Jeep, he noticed Poulakis leaning over to his right "either concealing or retrieving something from under one of the seats or glove box" according to the police report.

In the report, Rogers writes that he and Sgt. Eric Stender were fearful that Poulakis may have reached for a gun, so they asked him to step out of the vehicle.

In the process, Poulakis would not make eye contact and admitted to placing a beer can under his seat, the report said. Rogers then searched the Jeep and, according to the report, Poulakis "reluctantly" told Rogers that there was a handgun inside in the center console.

Rogers and Stender retrieved the .357 caliber pistol and arrested Poulakis for carrying a concealed weapon without a permit. His permit, according to the report, had expired on June, 13, 2004.

The law which the officers believe Poulakis broke says that anyone who carries a concealed weapon "on or about his or her person" has committed a crime.

But, according to Bevis, a concealed weapons permit is only needed if an individual intends to carry the gun on them. A permit is not necessary to keep it in a car's console or glove box.

"As long as you're not waving it, flashing it at people, and not a felon or something like that -- or drunk -- then just kind of leave it alone," Bevis said. "Your personal vehicle is an extension of your home by law."

In explaining why they dropped the charge, prosecutors cited the 2002 appellate court decision in Dixon v. State. In that case, the court ruled that as long as a gun is in a glove compartment, gun case, snapped in a holster or closed in a box with a lid, then its owner is not required to have a concealed weapons permit.

"So they arrest this guy for something that's not against the law," said Y. Drake Buckman, Poulakis' attorney. "It's just one of those things where the police didn't know the law and my client paid the price."

North Port Police Chief Terry Lewis says that even though the charges were dropped, the arrest was still justified.

And although Lewis would not comment on the specifics of the case, he said that rulings on the definition of a concealed weapon can vary.

In the end, he said, it all comes down to the judgment of the law enforcement officer and whether the officer believes there is enough probable cause to make an arrest.

"There's nothing that stands the hair up on a police officer more than a firearm," Lewis said. "In those cases, it's a judgment call."

 

« back to top


FL Police Make Costly Legal Error

SARASOTA, FL | Sarasota Herald-Tribune

Incident at man's house during dispute leads to $253K award
No crime was being committed when police arrived at Raphael McKinon's house. His ex-girlfriend was there, saying she wanted some clothes. McKinon wouldn't let her in.

Police asked McKinon to let Janine Rogers get her things, and when he refused, they arrested him on an obstruction charge.

Once inside, she stole $350 McKinon had left on the dresser, "just to be mean," she later said in a deposition.

The burglary -- and the $253,350 in damages a jury awarded McKinon on Wednesday for the officers violating his civil rights -- underscores why police are not supposed to get involved in civil disputes other than to keep the peace.

Police and sheriff's deputies are routinely asked to intervene to help people recover their possessions after a breakup. But without a court order, the officers have no right to enter a home when the owner says no, except in rare cases where immediate aid is required, legal experts say.

"Really, it comes down to a civil dispute and a judge is going to have to figure that out," Miami evictions law attorney Patrick Russell said. "The police should not take it upon themselves to be the judge and jury in that case."

The attorneys who represented McKinon in federal court say they believe what happened at McKinon's house was not an isolated incident.

"They obviously need better training and better supervising," Buckman said. "It's just a fundamental lack of understanding that they can't enter a house without a warrant."

Sarasota Police Chief Peter Abbott refused to discuss the incident or any police department policies regarding civil disputes. Spokesman Jay Frank said police officers are told to use their judgment in any situation.

There was no internal investigation into the January 2004 incident involving officers Eric Bolden and Sue Woniya, Frank said.

The officers arrived at the Dixon Avenue home after being called by Rogers , the mother of McKinon's child. She told them she lived there, and that she would leave if she could get her clothes, court records state.

McKinon told police she didn't have any property in the house and "he didn't know who she was."

Woniya knew he was lying.

Woniya also talked with neighbors, who told her Rogers lived there at the time because she was "always there, back and forth, in and out."

The officers, along with a supervisor who arrived at the scene, asked McKinon if Rogers could go in and retrieve her belongings, "as they felt that, as a tenant, she had the legal right to do so, based upon landlord-tenant law," court records state.

The officers tried to convince him for 40 minutes and then arrested him for obstruction.

McKinon's refusal should have been the end of the discussion, evictions expert Russell said.

"When he says no ... then at that point they say, 'That's as far as we can take it right now,'" Russell said. "It's not really their role to solve those types of problems."

The state attorney's office immediately saw problems with the obstruction charge against McKinon, and declined to prosecute him.

"There is no indication in the PCA (probable cause affidavit) that the officers were executing any court order, or writ, that would authorize them to enter the defendant's home without his consent," a prosecutor's memo states.

"In addition, there is no evidence that the items Ms. Rogers sought to retrieve from the defendant's home belonged to her."

When police respond to a situation like that, no crime is being committed, Russell said. The police should have told her that if she had possessions in the house, she could file a small claims case and get a court order to come back.

 

« back to top


Man Wins Lawsuit Against Police

October 5, 2006

LATISHA R. GRAY | latisha.gray@heraldtribune.com

A jury in federal court awarded a Sarasota man $253,350 in damages Wednesday afternoon in a lawsuit against two Sarasota police officers accused of violating his civil rights and arresting him without probable cause.

Raphael E. McKinon, 33, filed a lawsuit against Officers Eric Bolden and Sue Woniya about a year ago. McKinon said the two officers violated his civil rights when they allowed his baby's mother, Janine Rogers, to enter his home and take money and some of his personal belongings. McKinon was arrested and charged with obstruction after he refused to allow the woman and officers into the Dixie Avenue home.

According to court records, Rogers told police she had been living with McKinon since November 2003 and that they were breaking up. She had been released from prison two months earlier for assaulting a police officer. Her name was not on the lease, and McKinon's lawyer said he kicked her out because of drug use.

Officer Woniya talked with neighbors and learned Rogers had been staying with McKinon for at least two months.

McKinon believed Rogers was high on crack-cocaine when she came to the home, but officers didn't think Rogers was under the influence of drugs. McKinon reportedly told the officers that he did not know Rogers and that she never lived at the home.

McKinon repeatedly called 911 asking for a supervisor. Sgt. Norman Stockton, who is now a lieutenant in Internal Affairs, responded to the call.

The three officers reportedly talked to McKinon for more than 30 minutes about letting Rogers inside the home. After McKinon was arrested, the woman was allowed to go in the home.

Neither Bolden nor Woniya entered the house. Stockton went inside after McKinon's arrest to do a "protective sweep" to make sure nobody inside posed a security threat to law enforcement.

"He's a nurse trying to raise his kid and get ahead in life," said Drake Buckman, McKinon's attorney. "Does the system work? Yes, it does. Eight citizens (jurors) from all over the state of Florida vindicated the system today."

Sarasota Police Chief Peter Abbott did not return a phone call to his home Wednesday evening for comment.

McKinon has been arrested on several charges in the past, including drug possession and resisting arrest; most of those charges were dropped by the state.

"The irony of all of this is that Raphael McKinon knew the law better than these three officers and they have more than 45 years of experience," Buckman said.

"These officers had to learn that you can't arrogantly take the law into your own hands and make a decision."

Staff writer Michael Scarcella contributed to this report.

 

All content © 2004 Herald-Tribune Corp. and may not be republished without permission.

 

« back to top


Jury delivers not guilty verdict
in Palmetto murder case

December 05, 2007

MICHAEL A. SCARCELLA | scarcella@heraldtribune.com

BRADENTON - A jury tonight found an alleged member of the SUR 13 street gang not
guilty of second-degree murder in the shooting death of a 28-year-old Palmetto
man.

Aurelio Ibarra, 21, one of three men arrested after the shooting in November
2005, said he was not the shooter. The state declined prosecution against the
other men, saying there was not enough evidence to file charges.

The jury, which deliberated for nearly three hours, found Ibarra guilty of
misdemeanor theft, not robbery. Authorities said they found some of victim
Travis Pompey’s belongings in the car in which Ibarra and the other men were
arrested hours after the shooting.

“This is an example of the system working. This jury had hard work to do, they
took an oath and they did their job,” Ibarra’s attorney, Drake Buckman, said.
“The evidence just wasn’t there. He got equal treatment under the law today.”

Ibarra did not walk away a free man. He is among other alleged members of the
SUR 13 gang who are charged with racketeering.

Still, the verdict was a disappointment for the state.
“I thought we presented a strong case for conviction, so I am a little
disappointed,” Assistant State Attorney Art Brown said. Two jurors who were
alternates said they planned to vote guilty, Brown said.

The prosecution’s case was largely circumstantial, rooted in witness
observations about the shooter’s car and the fact a .25-caliber gun, crack
cocaine and Pompey’s cell phone were found in Ibarra’s car.

Ibarra, prosecutors say, bragged about the shooting while in jail. An inmate
provided information about the shooting that prosecutors said had not been
released to the public. But a Herald-Tribune story contained at least one piece
of that information, the caliber of the firearm.

Two .25-caliber shots were fired at Pompey in the 1500 block of 26th Street
East. Within hours, several men fired shots into a crowd outside a club in
Bradenton.
The men, according to witnesses, were in a dark-colored car similar to the one
described leaving the murder scene.

Still, authorities had no fingerprints, DNA evidence or any other conclusive
physical evidence connecting Ibarra to the shooting, Buckman said.

 

 

« back to top

Need Directions? click here!